Your turn: June 1 | Public education

0


Subject: “Combating exclusion from education through a civil rights law”, Other Views, 23 May:

Short of data and specific examples, this is one of the most poorly argued opinion pieces I’ve seen on your pages.

Case in point: We learn that the policies the author opposes are to “exclude many students of color from selective K-12 schools” because of “biased entrance exams”. Which exams? Which schools? We will never know.

The author does not like having to respect the bar of evidence. He wants Congress to reduce its burden as a litigator and pass legislation to force the courts to see things his way. Any obstacle in its path is a “Jim Crow” tactic.

Its main problem seems to be that the court system has ruled that Title VI plaintiffs seeking to sue for “disparate claims” must prove that the intention of the politicians they dislike is to discriminate against “historically marginalized students.” “.

Where’s the beef? Or in this case, “Where are these facts?”

John graham

Resilience lesson

When the pandemic started, there was a lot of back and forth at school, especially for less fortunate students. Fortunately, the school I attend has distributed laptops, as well as a Wi-Fi hotspot for students without internet.

When it comes to in-person learning, parents gave the impression that it was as dangerous as walking into a hospital full of COVID-19 cases, which was boring for some students, but others understood why their parents had reacted this way.

Going back to school was weird at first. Some students used to do everything at home. Others were really happy to leave their homes. Masks weren’t a big deal: most kids understood why masks were needed, and very few thought we didn’t need them. Just kids who are kids.

The return to in-person learning was not much different from before, besides the small student body.

Jasmine “Jax” Lopez



Source link

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.